一呼百应

两个建筑领域项目入选全市十大低碳应用场景_我的网站

A |     NEW DELHI -- India’s top court on Tuesday refused to legalize same-sex marriages, passing the responsibility back to Parliament in a ruling that disappointed campaigners for LGBTQ+ rights in the world's most populous country. Chief Justice DY Chandrachud also urged the government to uphold the rights of the queer community and end discrimination against them. Earlier this year, the five-judge bench heard 21 petitions that sought to legalize same-sex marriage. Chandrachud said there were degrees of agreement and disagreement among the justices “on how far we have to go” on same-sex marriages, but a majority of the judges agreed that the court cannot grant LGBTQ+ people the right to marry as that is a legislative function. “This court can’t make law. It can only interpret it and give effect to it,” the chief justice said, reiterating that it was up to Parliament to decide whether it could expand marriage laws to include queer unions.One of the petitioners, Mario da Penha, said it was “a day to be disappointed but not to lose hope.”“There's been tremendous work that has gone into these petitions, and many hopes and dreams of the queer community attached to them - to lead lives that most other Indians take for granted. The fact that the dream could not come to fruition today is a disappointment for all of us,” he said.He added that it was not yet clear if the court had set a mandate or timeline for Parliament to act. “Without that mandate, there is no pressure on Parliament to enact any legislation.”“There are queer couples today that are already families and in relationships, and are pillars of society. That they are not afforded the dignity and rights that they are due is deeply disappointing,” said Karuna Nundy, one of the lawyers representing the petitioners. Legal rights for LGBTQ+ people in India have been expanding over the past decade, mostly as a result of the Supreme Court’s intervention. In 2018, the top court struck down a colonial-era law that had made gay sex punishable by up to 10 years in prison and expanded constitutional rights for the gay community. The decision was seen as a historic victory for LGBTQ rights, with one judge saying it would “pave the way for a better future."Despite this progress, Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government resisted the legal recognition of same-sex marriage and rejected several petitions in favor. During the hearings, the government argued that a marriage is only between a biological male and a biological woman, adding that same-sex marriages went against religious values and that the petitions reflected only “urban elitist views”. Religious groups too had opposed same-sex unions, saying they went against Indian culture.Adish Aggarwala, the president of the Supreme Court bar association, said the court had done the right thing by recognizing that this was a job for Parliament, an argument the government also made during the hearings. Lawyers for the petitioners argued that marriage is between two people, not just a man and woman. They said concepts of marriage have gradually changed with time and laws should acknowledge that. By not recognizing such unions, the government was depriving same-sex couples of their right to equality enshrined in the constitution and rights enjoyed by married heterosexual couples, from adoption and medical insurance to pensions and inheritance, they argued. “This court needs to push society to acknowledge same-sex marriage,” one of the lawyers said.Petitioners were hopeful that the Supreme Court could challenge the government’s position.But even as some of the justices urged that the state must make sure queer couples don't face harassment or discrimination in accessing basic needs, like opening a joint bank account, they stopped short of granting legal recognition to same-sex unions. Instead, the court accepted the government's offer to set up a special panel that will explore granting social and legal benefits to same-sex couples. Homosexuality has long carried a stigma in India’s traditional society, even though there has been a shift in attitudes toward same-sex couples in recent years. India now has openly gay celebrities and some high-profile Bollywood films have dealt with gay issues. According to a Pew survey, acceptance of homosexuality in India increased by 22 percentage points to 37% between 2013 and 2019.But same-sex couples often face harassment in many Indian communities, whether Hindu, Muslim or Christian.India is estimated to have at least 2.5 million LGBTQ+ people, according to government figures from 2012. However, gay rights activists and global estimates believe they number at least 10% of the population, or more than 135 million.In May, Taiwan became the first jurisdiction in Asia to recognize same-sex marriages. In July, Nepal's Supreme Court issued an interim order enabling the registration of same-sex marriages for the first time. It is still not clear when the court would make its final decision on the case.。

B |     近日，记者从市建委获悉，2026年度杭州市十大低碳应用场景评选结果公布，上城区数字能源港低碳园区示范场景、钱塘区焱唐超级工厂动态显色发电建筑立面示范场景两个建筑领域场景成功入选。数字能源港坐落于上城区钱塘智慧城城北园区，占地0.61平方公里，曾是“空间紧、负荷密、用能杂”的典型老旧工业园区。如今，项目集成园区内外200余项先进技术，从制能、储能、用能、节能四个维度完成全链路系统性低碳改造，成为都市老工业园区绿色低碳转型的标杆。数字能源港制定了“整体规划、分类施策、技术精准匹配”的系统方案。办公楼侧重“超量绿电生产+五恒环境调控+光储直柔”技术组合，让楼宇自己“晒太阳发电”，同时为室内提供舒适恒温环境；厂房配套光伏储能、应急供电、货运车辆电动化，以稳定用电保障生产运转；公共区域采用绿电直接供电、多功能空间布局、智能AI照明，既节能又实用。园区还搭建起自主研发的智慧能源大脑平台，依托专业算法，光伏发电与用电负荷预测准确率均超90%；结合实时气象监测，系统可提前启动空调预调，自动调节园区室内温度；还能调节充电桩错峰充电，把光伏产生的绿色电力直接供给周边建筑使用。

C | 经系统性改造，数字能源大厦实现负碳运行，获国家零碳建筑认证，数字能源孵化器及风雨长廊获国家近零碳建筑认证。

D | 焱唐能源科技工厂立面BIPV项目位于钱塘区临江高科产业园，将龙焱能源科技自主研发的光伏产品铺设于厂房南、西立面，立面安装总面积达4234平方米，总装机容量542千瓦；项目同时采用自主研发的碲化镉薄膜彩色技术，相较传统彩釉工艺，透光率提升超100%，组件光电转换效率达13%以上。这套光伏幕墙不仅是高效的发电单元，更是高性能的保温隔热层。实测数据显示，相较原有金属幕墙，应用“燚彩”光伏幕墙后，厂房外墙热渗透率降低37%，室内温度下降4℃—6℃，大幅削减了夏季空调的用电负荷。据测算，该项目在25年生命周期内，预计累计减排二氧化碳7962吨、二氧化硫240吨、氮化物120吨。

Current article:http://www.lindunfokangliucishirun.shop/39w/20260826/5681.pptx

Published on:16:53:53