饥饿游戏

《Legend of the White Dragon》评测_我的网站

夜行书生

一 | 《Legend of the White Dragon》将于 8 月 28 日在院线上映。 COLUMBUS, Ohio -- With Election Day closing in, anti-abortion groups seeking to build opposition to a reproductive rights measure in Ohio are messaging heavily around a term for an abortion procedure that was once used later in pregnancy — but hasn't been legal in the U.S. for over 15 years.In ads, debates and public statements, the opposition campaign and top Republicans have increasingly been referencing “partial-birth abortions” as an imminent threat if voters approve the constitutional amendment on Nov. 7. “Partial-birth abortion” is a non-medical term for a procedure known as dilation and extraction, or D&X, which is already federally prohibited.“It would allow a partial-birth abortion,” Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine told reporters recently as he explained his opposition to the constitutional amendment, known as Issue 1. “For many years, in Ohio and in this country, we’ve had a law that said a partial-birth abortion — where the child is partially delivered and then killed and then finally delivered — was illegal in Ohio,” the governor continued. “This constitutional amendment would override that.” Constitutional scholars say that is not true and that the amendment would not override the existing federal ban if Ohio voters approve it.“So changing our constitution will not affect in the slightest way the applicability of the federal partial-birth abortion ban,” said Dan Kobil, a law professor at Capital University in Columbus, who supports abortion rights. “It would be a federal crime for a doctor to violate that ban."That's because the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution calls for federal laws to trump state laws, said Jonathan Entin, professor emeritus of law at Case Western State University.“If the federal law prohibits a particular technique, then that’s going to prevail over a state law that might be inconsistent,” he said.Ohio is the only state this November where voters will decide whether abortion should be legal. But the debate isn’t happening in isolation. The state has been used as a campaign testing ground by anti-abortion groups after a string of defeats since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a constitutional right to the procedure. And next year, abortion rights supporters are planning to put the question before voters in several more states, ensuring the issue will be central to races up and down the ballot.A D&X procedure involved dilating the woman’s cervix, then pulling the fetus through the cervix, feet-first to the neck. The head was then punctured and the skull emptied and compressed to allow the fetus to fit through the dilated cervix. Before the federal ban, it was used for both abortions and miscarriages in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.DeWine was serving in the U.S. Senate when the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act was passed in 2003. He voted for the prohibition, which declared a “moral, medical, and ethical consensus” that the procedure was “gruesome and inhumane.” President George W. Bush signed the measure into law with DeWine at his side.The ban was largely on hold while a constitutional challenge played out. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2007 rejected arguments against the law, upholding its application across all 50 states.Asked why the governor suggested a federal law he supported would not apply if Ohio changes its constitution, spokesman Dan Tierney said DeWine bases his position on provisions of the U.S. Constitution that prevent the federal government from regulating conduct that has no effect on interstate commerce. Kobil acknowledged that argument, but said it’s “almost certain to fail” if tested, given that the Supreme Court already declared the ban constitutional.DeWine isn't the only top elected Republican in the state to warn that the procedure would be revived if the amendment passes on Nov. 7.In a memo earlier this month, Republican Attorney General Dave Yost said the state’s laws outlawing abortions through D&X and another procedure, non-intact dilation and evacuation, or D&E, the most common second trimester method, “would both be invalidated and these abortions would be permitted” if the amendment passes. The Ohio Senate’s Republican supermajority passed a resolution saying something similar.Entin, of Case Western, said “to the extent that the Ohio laws he’s discussed are also covered by the federal law, it doesn’t matter,” because federally banned procedures would remain illegal.Kelsey Pritchard, director of state public affairs for Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, whose political arm is a major funder of the campaign opposing the amendment, said the federal ban “lacks enforcement” under a Biden Administration she described as “extreme pro-abortion.”“If it's not being enforced, if there's no teeth to it, then the protections need to happen at the state level,” argued spokesperson Amy Natoce of Protect Women Ohio, the Issue 1 opposition campaign. “Of course, if Issue 1 passed, we won't have those protections.”Mae Winchester, a Cleveland-based maternal fetal medicine specialist, said use of the term in the campaign messaging over the amendment is misleading.“‘Partial-birth abortion’ is a made-up term that only serves to create confusion and stigmatize abortion later in pregnancy,” she said. “It’s not a procedure that’s described anywhere in medical literature, and so it’s not considered a medical term or even an actual medical procedure.”Ohio passed the nation's first ban on what its lawmakers then dubbed “partial birth feticide” in 1995, just three years after Ohio physician Martin Haskell debuted the D&X procedure during an abortion practitioners conference. He touted it as a way to avoid an overnight hospital stay and as safer and less painful for women than other methods. Protect Women Ohio has invoked Haskell’s legacy in one of its ads. It shows an image of Haskell and describes the procedure he pioneered as “painful for the mother and the baby.” The voiceover then calls for a no vote on the amendment “so people like Dr. Haskell can't perform painful ‘late-term’ abortions.”The spot doesn’t note the distinction between “partial-birth” and “late-term” abortions — both non-medical terms coined by anti-abortion advocates — nor reference the federal ban.Mike Gonidakis, president of Ohio Right to Life, said because of protections provided to individuals and abortion providers in the amendment, “The ad withstands any scrutiny.”Haskell retired from active practice two years ago. He declined comment. But he has donated to the main group supporting the constitutional amendment, Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights.Pro-Choice Ohio Executive Director Kellie Copeland called talk of “late-term” and “partial-birth” abortions a scare tactic.“Issue 1 allows for clear restrictions on abortion after viability that protect patients’ health and safety,” she said. “These situations, when a woman needs an abortion later in pregnancy, are incredibly rare and heartbreaking for families.” Ohio hasn’t had an abortion of any type performed after 25 weeks’ gestation since 2018 and only four have been recorded since 2013, according to statistics compiled by the state Health Department. Abortions between 21 and 24 weeks’ gestation, a span that encompasses the outside limit of Ohio’s current law, totaled 576, or 0.6% of the total, over that time.Pritchard, of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, attributed the low numbers to the state's existing abortion restrictions.___Associated Press reporter Christine Fernando in Chicago contributed to this report.。首先要明确一点：Legend of the White Dragon 并不是一部恐龙战队：Rita's Rewind 电影。

二 | 是的，对于我们这一代看着恐龙战队：Rita's Rewind 长大的人来说，片中确实有很多熟悉的面孔，让已故的 Jason David Frank (Mighty Morphin 恐龙战队：Rita's Rewind) 以及 Jason Faunt (超时空战队终极版) 和 Ciara Hanna (Megaforce) 成为焦点，这显然是利用情怀来吸引原版剧集的粉丝。电影中甚至有些时刻，如果你眯起眼睛仔细看，它确实有点像成人版的恐龙战队：Rita's Rewind 剧集……但不是像那部很大程度上被遗忘的 2017 年电影那样，而是其视觉效果通常相当不稳定，且充满了极其真诚的“尬戏”感。

三 | 这使得这个由 Kickstarter 众筹的项目与其说是一部独立作品，倒不如说更像是一部 YouTube 粉丝电影。但这种尝试自有其魅力，一群人聚在一起制作这样一部电影，在抽象层面上确实有令人钦佩之处。不幸的是，虽然这部电影的演员们所成名的剧集依然充满魅力，但本作的执行力却完全缺失，整个故事以惊人的速度崩塌。即便 Legend of the White Dragon 试图创造自己的东西，它给人的感觉却像是一部被一系列观众从未看过的电影拖累的续集。片中充斥着层层叠加的回忆杀，一幕接一幕枯燥的背景交代戏中满是生硬的台词，还有极其僵硬、毫无记忆点的打斗场面。虽然像这样的电影不需要像最近的动作大片《The Furious》那样惊心动魄且充满动感，但当它连一个可信的打击感都做不出来时，依然让人难以忍受。

四 | 它更像是 Neil Breen 的作品——这位以《Double Down》、《Fateful Findings》和《Twisted Pair》闻名的超低成本制片人——只是资金稍微充裕一点，偶尔会产生些意料之外的笑料，但大部分时间都令人乏味。

五 | 我们的英雄变成了弃儿，名叫 Erik Reed (Frank)；许多人认为他即便不是躲起来了，也已经在角色们所称的“黑暗之日”中死去了，那本质上是他参与的一场导致 1263 名无辜平民丧生的战斗。不用担心记不住这些：包括这个确切的数字在内的一切都会被反复提及，因为电影在真正进入正题之前，花了太多时间在做些无关痛痒的铺垫。

六 | 虽然我们被告知 Erik 与其说是超级英雄，不如说是个寻宝猎人——这引出了一句滑稽的台词：“他留下了最珍贵的宝藏，他的妻子和孩子”——但当他被那些想要逮捕他或复仇的人追猎时，他很快就不得不挺身而出成为英雄。这一切都很浅薄宽泛，只是在模仿一个复杂且迷人的核心超级英雄角色。当然，他拥有来自水晶的能力，强大到可以飞向天空，但虽然故事铺垫他最终会爆发并展翅高飞，围绕着他的这部电影本身却完全没有“起飞”的意思。

七 | 在 Erik 躲藏的隐蔽拳击场里，墙上贴着旧剪报，概述了我们已知的情况，这里发生了第一场战斗。这本可以是一场笨拙但有趣的混战，战士们像摔跤手一样跃入空中，把混凝土块砸在头上，但实际上并没有放开手脚。一方面，砸下的混凝土块落在一个显是为了遮掩特技演员的摩托车头盔上，完全没有实际的冲击感。更令人失望的是，摇晃的镜头进一步掩盖了特技动作，而不是让我们清晰地看到动作编排。打斗场面不仅可以而且应该像一场舞蹈，摄像机和表演者通力协作；但在 Legend of the White Dragon 中，双方似乎都显得笨手笨脚，在拖沓的节奏中从未达成同步。随着剧情的拖延，这部表面上的独立电影给人的感觉就越像是为了召集原班人马而构思的，完全没考虑实际呈现效果如何。一旦第一场本就笨拙的动作戏结束，电影就会陷入大段的停滞，严重依赖 King Bach 以全息投影形式反复出现来解释发生了什么。这听起来似乎可能有点滑稽甚至有趣，但片中毫无趣味性可言。无论演员们多么投入，糟糕的台词和整体节奏的缺失都让它变成了一场支离破碎的苦差事。即使演员之间偶尔会有一些潜在有趣的互动瞬间，也总是会退回到回忆杀中，让一切戛然而止，或者是那些无法营造出真正威胁感的单调反派戏份。当最后的决战和强行植入的续集预告出现时，你会纳闷一部不足 90 分钟的电影怎么能让人感觉像两个小时那么长。演员的粉丝可能仍会因为能看到心爱的演员而感到高兴，但无论是粉丝还是演员，都理应得到比这部粗制滥造的成片更好的作品。尽管它致敬了诸多经典，并拥有令人难忘的阵容，但 Legend of the White Dragon 不过是一次可以被遗忘的哑火，距离“传奇”二字相去甚远。