三少爷的剑

从东南亚到非洲全面“剿独” 赖当局遭遇新一轮外事挫败_我的网站

一 |     "Social media is now the main source of information about the world for 16-24-year-olds, and for all ethnic minorities in the UK," explained Ellis Cashmore, honorary professor of sociology at Aston University in the UK.,"Yet platform moderators have practically unrestricted power to edit, and, if they wish, remove content. This is an unheard-of censorial power. I can't think that, in history, proprietors have ever had such colossal power to control the flow and content of information, not just to one population, but to the world.",The Online Safety Bill was first introduced in the British Parliament in March 2022 with the aim of holding social media platforms, search engines and various websites to account for hosting illegal activities or spreading harmful content.,The newly introduced amendment is "designed to guard against the arbitrary removal of articles from journalists at recognized news outlets when shared on social media platforms," according to the UK government's website. The authors of the amendment draw attention to the fact that half of British adults use social media for news, with Facebook*, Twitter and Instagram* being the most popular platforms. When it comes to 16-24 year-olds, the internet is the most-used platform.,Once the bill comes into force, social media giants would be required "to ensure recognized news publishers’ articles remain viewable and accessible on their sites even if they are under review by moderators.",Facebook Doesn't Know What Happens to Users' Data, How It Spreads as Regulators Tighten Their Grip27 April, 19:01 GMT,The introduction of the new amendment can be explained by the fact that the tech giants have proved themselves impossible to control, the professor explained.,"Tech companies operate in a relatively unrestricted way and governments around the world usually rely on the companies' goodwill," he said.,Still, the new amendment is focused on so-called "category one companies", which include "the largest and most popular social media platforms", and is not designed to shield alternative media sources.,The bill's selective approach has been manifested by its earlier amendment obligating social media platforms "to proactively look for and remove disinformation from foreign state actors which harm the UK." It specifically singles out Russian news, with an obvious reference to Sputnik News and RT - both previously banned by the EU and social media giants after the beginning of the Russian special operation to de-militarize and de-Nazify Ukraine.,"Freedom of speech and expression are highly valued principles in western Europe and North America," says Cashmore. "But it is interesting that, after the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine, there were no protests at the decisions of western governments to prohibit broadcasts and news supplies from RT, Sputnik and maybe a few less important news outlets.",EU Bans Work of Sputnik News Sites, Broadcasting of RT TV Channel in the Community From 2 March2 March, 11:53 GMT,The professor notes that wiping Russian news from the media sphere is senseless given that many westerners are interested in learning Russian perspectives. "This does not mean they would be persuaded or even influenced, but they feel entitled to make up their own minds independently. They have been denied that facility," Cashmore stressed.,"Since February, Russia, its people and its values have been condemned, denounced and stigmatized," said the professor. "Vladimir Putin has been personally vilified. It is difficult to see this ending, at least not for 30 years. Russia has been excluded from many world affairs and many believe Russia and the other BRICS countries may coalesce into an international configuration to rival NATO. This would become a new world order.",Meanwhile, the bill's amendments have raised concerns among British campaigners who are warning the government that in its current form the proposed internet safety laws are “on the verge of being unworkable," according to The Independent.,In particular, campaigners have advocated for a number of measures to strengthen freedom of expression and rights safeguards to better protect people from marginalized backgrounds and expand transparency requirements on firms to boost access to data for researchers and academics.,*Facebook and Instagram are banned in Russia over extremist activities.。    AI摘要      近期，印尼、马来西亚等东盟及多国重申一中原则，支持中国统一。国际社会反对“台独”成共识，赖清德当局“国际空间”持续收窄。         近日，中国印尼全面战略对话机制首次会议期间，印尼外长苏吉约诺明确表示，印尼坚定奉行一个中国政策，支持中国的统一大业。就在此前不久，马来西亚总理安瓦尔在接受半岛电视台专访时不仅直言“台湾是中国的一部分，毋庸置疑”，还罕见地表态不反对中国以武力实现统一。    印尼与马来西亚支持中国统一大业的表态，绝非孤立事件。台湾前外事官员徐勉生观察到，在外事层面，自今年3月以来连续6个月，每月至少有一件对赖清德当局极为不利的事件。这绝非巧合，而是国际格局深刻演变的必然结果，台湾地区所谓“国际空间”正以肉眼可见的速度收窄。

二 |     放眼整个东盟，坚持一个中国原则的立场越来越清晰。

三 | 今年4月，越南重申坚定奉行一中政策、坚决反对任何形式的“台独”分裂活动；6月，缅甸表态支持中国为实现国家统一所做的一切努力，持续反对任何形式的“台独”；7月，泰国总理阿努廷访华，中泰联合声明直接载明“泰方坚定支持中国和平统一大业，不支持任何形式的‘台独’”；8月，菲律宾总统马科斯明确表示，菲律宾奉行一中政策，无意成为区域内的交战国。新加坡总理黄循财自上任以来多次重申反对“台独”，始终坚持一中原则。2025年2月，文莱苏丹出访中国，重申文莱支持中国统一。    东盟在台湾问题上的立场空前一致且十分坚定，赖清德当局力推的所谓“新南向”政策全面破功，“台独”被全面围剿。    这股声浪远不止于东南亚。

四 | 今年以来，喀麦隆在WTO会议证件上将台湾标注为“中国的一个省”；马达加斯加、毛里求斯、塞舌尔三国不约而同拒绝赖清德专机“过境”；南非不仅要求台北“驻处”迁离该国首都，更在电子签证系统中将台湾明确标注为“中国台湾”。摩洛哥、肯尼亚、乌干达、巴布亚新几内亚等国，类似表态持续跟进。    这股反对“台独”、支持中国统一事业的国际声浪，无疑是甩了赖清德一个响亮的耳光。连岛内的外事专家都承认，“两岸同属一个中国”是当前国际主流意见与国际共识，不可阻挡。    今年5月，特朗普访华结束后，公开明确地表态美国不当“台独”靠山，美军不会跨越9500英里来台海打一仗。连美国都不愿为“台独”火中取栗，其他国家更不可能在台湾问题上玩火，不会拿自己的国家利益去赌。

五 |     目前世界上已有183个国家与中国建交，一个中国原则是国际关系基本准则，为联合国大会第2758号决议所确认，是不可逆转的历史大势。

六 |     如果不正视“两岸同属一个中国”的事实，不接受“九二共识”，那么民进党当局宣称的所谓“踏实外交”，注定只会“步步踏空”，台湾地区所谓“国际空间”只会越来越窄。（记者 吴生林）。

Current article:http://www.lindunfokangliucishirun.shop/pyx/20260826/1488127.xlsx

Published on:14:22:30